ANC political mistake/disaster thro tactically removing T. Mbeki a Technocrat/Administrator & replacing with Colorful Politician/Traditionalist Jacob

ANC political mistake/disaster through tactically removing T. Mbeki a
Technocrat/Administrator & replacing him with Colorful
Politician/Traditionalist Jacob Zuma

ANC made political mistake/disaster by tactically removing Former
South African President T. Mbeki a Technocrat/Administrator &
replacing him with a Colorful Politician/Traditionalist Jacob Zuma,
also Zimbabwean Natives lack of development, is similar to South
Africa.

Therefore,it is only a Technocrat/sound Administrator can gradually
put in place political, educational and technical developmental
machinery to propel the desired native development, since White
Minority has technological, commercial, economic and educational
advantage,with Black only possessing simple political numerical
advantage, which is the least tool for national development and it
will time, efforts and better strategy to develop the Black and South
Africans don't need the person of Zuma, except for ceremonial purposes
as the issue of development, if not properly handled, can create
racial disharmony and distrust.

Jacob Zuma, a Minority's Strategy/Tactics to either divide or destroy ANC.
----------------------
The careful political observation/Study of complex Strategy/intrigues,
being employed by a consortium of South African Minorities' interest
group and its economic Power Hegemony to strategize for political
Power in South Africa. Their careful implemented political script
which have nailed or implicated Jacob Zuma for various offenses but
with another tactic, Zuma was left off the hook for as a strategy and
he got a political boost through well coordinated and organized
networks of Labor Unions, backing of his tribal group in ANC together
with Minority influenced local & international Media to portray Zuma
as being victimized by President Mbeki but all these, are careful
planned deliberate programs to divide or to destroy African National
Congress (ANC),a predominately Black control South African Party
although there are inclusion of Minorities as create balance and
ensure political Stability but the Minorities still felt that Black
interest is heavily protected than theirs while Minorities are opting
for a Party where they can technically control. Hence, Minorities whom
control economy, technology and developmental institutions, used its
vast political influence and other tools to plot and position Zuma as
the next ANC President with a lot of credibility's problem, which will
be exploited during the electioneering campaign, as much damaging
evidences will be emerging during the his campaign, which is capable
of making ANC to loose the electoral Poll or not to be able for ANC to
secure majority Votes, thereby loosing its stakes and political
domination to Minorities who already control the Economy/Commerce.


There is widely accepted opinion in West, that groups of people that
made up the Minorities groups, wants a better stake than what are
currently having in the political circle and to achieve this, they
needed a better coordinated political program with some moderate
Blacks as to build much better South Africa as the current ANC is
slightly moving towards to old African ways of slow, corrupt and
bitter political methods of doing governmental things which negates
modern ways of doing things better and contradict easy ways of running
Government.


It is imperatively sad that the old man Nelson Mandela was misinformed
as to lay his support to Zuma for this disastrous political venture
which Zuma and ANC have embarked into. It is surprise to Thinkers that
Mandela despite his experience, reputation with his forthrightness
could not stand boldly and advise Zuma to step down to any of his
choice lieutenants who can do his bidding as to not to divide or
destroy ANC.

Mandela's endorsement is seen as mark of not wanting anything or group
to attack his reputation but at long run, his reputation/his person is
still at stake and history will not be at mercy with his
reputation/his person, at the end of this episode, as life is not
always smooth and bitter truth must always be told despite its
consequences.

Endorsement is not the way out of this programmed ugly political
situation and the damage which Zuma and his group will deliver to ANC
is disastrous with an inherit unstable political situation which will
the country bitterly divided and unstable for any meaningful
development.


Although, the Media is tactically tailored to propagate such agenda
and brainwashed the Elite, Academicians, Labor Unions and rural Class
but outcome, will still bad, Now Zuma stage managed by Whites to
become the President, as he cannot firmly control the nation as to
move it forward. It is reasonable for South Africans to think above
their noose and reason tactically and intellectually as to challenge
such hidden agenda before Zuma damage South Africa beyond recovery.

(It is sufficiently evident that Zuma with these overwhelming
evidences, is guilty as charged, as much of his wrong doings will
start to emerge abundantly as a President)

regards

Mazi Patrick


-----------------
Britain/World perceived Mugabe Regime as Zimbabwean Problem but
Fundamental issues and lack necessary mutual co-existing
Arrangements/Agreement, which were not properly and principally agreed
and signed by all parties as to protect and safeguard the interest of
British & other foreigners who are staying behind when Zimbabwe secure
its Independence from Britain and before necessarily British handing
over Political Power to the Zimbabwean Ruling Political Party ZANU-
PF. Tactically, US Government is reacting wrong toward Zimbabwe, based
on wrong Advice and not well conceived Directives from Britain while
Britain made fundamental mistake on not securing proper arrangement
before granting Independence, as British thought it was possible to
maneuver its way and protect its interest through manipulation's
political tool.

Similarly, such interest protection's arrangements and mutual
understanding memorandum on Hong Kong, were principally agreed and
undertaken by British with China, which allows the British to freely
participate in Hong Kong's Economy and Commerce while China control
Defense, internal affairs and Politics of Hong Kong before China took
over the Hong Kong Territory.

While in South Africa case, a multi parties' mutual co-existing
Arrangements/Agreement were fundamentally agreed by ANC, other
Minority Political Parties, Afrikaans (Dutch) and British before South
African Independence. This, paved way for ANC to control Presidential
Power, Defense, internal affairs and other sectors, Dutch Afrikaans
participate largely in Commerce, Agriculture and technological based
projects, British overlook Economy and other special interest while
Indians/Asians and Arabs overlook the land Transport, Trade and other
sectors. Even in order to allow a stable/ peaceful co-existing, some
initiatives and encouragements were taken as to partially please all,
and that is why al Races were encouraged to enter ANC Black dominated
political Party and in concert with other Minorities formed a South
African Government when Apartheid collapsed. The National South
African Government resulted in British South African become the
Finance Minister & others, Indian South African become the Transport
Minister, ANC Black South Africans took Presidency, Defense portfolio
& others. This is why South Africa was able to survive a Nation
despite South Africa rated high in Crime and Violence, since South
Africa achievements were only partially executed, as South African
problematic Land distribution issue was agreed upon, coupled with slow
pace of integrating and empowering Blacks educationally, economically
and technically, as most Blacks still live very poorly in ghettoes.


Ironically, South African Blacks merely controls political power
through ANC- a Majority Ruling Party while the other Minorities are
visibly in charge of strategic of the Economy, Commerce, Aviation,
Industries, Education and Technology. Fundamentally, lack of these
mentioned potentials made very difficult to easily to be integrated
fully and to be empowered economically as to live decently. Those in
the Media who are championing that ANC led by Mbeki is not doing well,
strategically do not study the real dynamics and complex nature of
South African Problem, with violent Crime daily committed, due to huge
arms left in hands of poor, without retrieving them after liberation
struggle and end of apartheid.

Strategically, if MDC the Zimbabwean Opposition Party which is
claiming the Zimbabwean electoral victory, is allowed to control,
gradually they will shift to ZANU-PF style of governance, if
fundamental; issues were not sorted before Governance, black
nationalism will propel them to act, behave and execute political
programs like Mugabe led ZANU-PF. Otherwise internal party wriggling
and division will emerge with a new confrontation and challenge will
force to toe the line of Mugabe if properly agreements were not
arranged before MDC Governance.

regards
Mazi Patrick